moo

[Cows Engel]

Impressive display of lingvistic and logical skill there Meta! I MOOOOOO in honor of them <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br>
<br>
/Engel

<p></p><i></i>

[Meta BROz]

<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><b> mo</b><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> /moo/ The correct answer to the classic trick question "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?". Assuming that you have no wife or you have never beaten your wife, the answer "yes" is wrong because it implies that you used to beat your wife and then stopped, but "no" is worse because it suggests that you have one and are still beating her. According to various Discordians and Douglas Hofstadter the correct answer is usually "mu", a Japanese word alleged to mean "Your question cannot be answered because it depends on incorrect assumptions". Hackers tend to be sensitive to logical inadequacies in language, and many have adopted this suggestion with enthusiasm. The word `mu' is actually from Chinese, meaning `nothing'; it is used in mainstream Japanese in that sense, but native speakers do not recognize the Discordian question-denying use. It almost certainly derives from overgeneralization of the answer in the following well-known Rinzei Zen teaching riddle: <br>
<br>
<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><i> A monk asked Joshu, "Does a dog have the Buddha nature?" Joshu retorted, "Mu!"</i><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br>
<br>
source: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.jargon.net/jargonfile/m/mu.h ... <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>
<br>
/Meta <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :lol --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /laugh.gif ALT=":lol"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END-->

<p></p><i></i>