Teamspeak 3

Moooo whatever you like in here...
User avatar
StarSoft
Web-Cow
Posts: 468
Joined: 19 Feb 2004, 19:01
Location: where the grass is the greenest
Contact:

Post by StarSoft »

Looks good, but do we need it? Good question.
Why did we choose TS over Ventrilo at the time? Ventrilo offered better sound quality but a little more lag. These things have changed, everyone has a high speed internet connection right now, so lag should/will not be caused anymore by the few kb/s a voip-client takes away from you.

We don't need it but it might be a nice changed, improving sound quality as we don't really have to look at the bandwidth being used. It's definitely worth a try.
We also switched from BattleCom to Teamspeak at the time.

I wonder if a TS3 server would still allow TS2 clients to connect but offer them the lower quality. Would be nice.
But we will see in a month or so :)
Jopez
Posts: 68
Joined: 07 Jan 2006, 16:01
Contact:

Post by Jopez »

I think its coming, since our clanleader told we are gonna try that...
but i dont understand where we need it? TS 2 is working fine for me...
Image
User avatar
KOF
Web-Cow
Posts: 876
Joined: 05 Apr 2002, 20:09
Location: the Netherlands
Contact:

Teamspeak 3

Post by KOF »

Will it really happen ?!?!?

19th december, the open beta upcoming
Post Reply