Fun time
- Snooooop
- Sp.Cows
- Posts: 784
- Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 04:44
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: 02 Oct 2006, 19:26
You know guns are usually made from metal and that they don't melt from water? And it wasn't raining. It had rained in the night and hunting moose in a wet forest kinda doesn't keep the guns dry. And who cares, it doesn't hurt...Snooooop wrote:And i hafta agree, why are those guns out in the rain when they arent being used?
Well to you cityfolk, not all hunting trips/lands have cabins with running water and electricity...



(the hills far back are on swedish side..)
-
- Master Spammer
- Posts: 1265
- Joined: 04 May 2005, 18:40
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
- StarSoft
- Web-Cow
- Posts: 468
- Joined: 19 Feb 2004, 19:01
- Location: where the grass is the greenest
- Contact:
- Snooooop
- Sp.Cows
- Posts: 784
- Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 04:44
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 02:23
- Location: Lost on the Battlefield
- Contact:


You know you can do lot of other things too with a good scope than pose them in front of a rock in rain. I like to shoot with mine rather than taking photos of them or leaving them outside it to rain. I'm quite sure they could manage that too, but would I?

-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 02:23
- Location: Lost on the Battlefield
- Contact:
Nope, good optics rule & next time post a picture of one...Heggis wrote:Optics rule!

Reason why optics are better is simple. For a normal person it's impossible to focus ones eye for three different distances(rear sight, front sight & target) at the same time. With Scopes & red dot sights one must only focus on the target. The sight - if a proper one - will draw a nice reticle upon the target & one's eye has to focus only on one distance. A good scope also make's the picture clearer than what it really is. Not just the magnification, but brighter picture/better contrast also.
Anyone who has ever tried some good sights, like Zeiss, Schmidt & Bender, Leupold(older Mark4-series), Swarovski, Hensoldt etc. can confirm this. Since even .223 rem is accurate up to 600 meters in good conditions, why not take everything out of that accuracy.
Only reasons I see for iron sights upon rifle are motivation shooting puposes & lack of money.

-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: 02 Oct 2006, 19:26
Other than they are better than iron sights in almost every possible way? 
On the upper rifle, kinda hard to hit a 4" target at 500 yards without optics. And on the lower moose hunting rifle... It's a 1-4 magnification scope with illuminated reticle. Faster target acquisition and much better in lower lighting conditions.
Optics rule!


On the upper rifle, kinda hard to hit a 4" target at 500 yards without optics. And on the lower moose hunting rifle... It's a 1-4 magnification scope with illuminated reticle. Faster target acquisition and much better in lower lighting conditions.
Optics rule!

- Snooooop
- Sp.Cows
- Posts: 784
- Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 04:44
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 02:23
- Location: Lost on the Battlefield
- Contact:
-
- Master Spammer
- Posts: 1265
- Joined: 04 May 2005, 18:40
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
- Krasavitsa
- Sp.Cows
- Posts: 204
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 05:54
- Contact:
- Snooooop
- Sp.Cows
- Posts: 784
- Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 04:44
- Contact: